As lawyers, we often evaluate how strong our cases are based on the objective information, and not on support systems which elucidate this information. Even though the dramas featured on television shows portray attorneys as sole determiners of cases, we are aware that before any case reaches court, some individuals that work in different capacities can either break or make its quality, one of these is the court reporters.
As all the attorneys are aware of that the strength of the majority of cases are determined ultimately by how strong the deposition is. Even though the attorneys examine depositions scrupulously, they will rarely examine qualifications of the deposition reporters. This is because many of the attorneys are just too occupied to examine court reporters Portland. However, there are ways that attorneys can choose the very best of the reporters without having to investigate them by making contact with the right court reporting agencies. Here are three factors of court reporter screening processes which define reporting agencies that are reputable.
Screening Of References
Certified court reporting has been associated with having the correct certifications for this job. But any person who has had bad experiences with certified court reporters will attest that the reporter’s value will depend more on her or his certifications. One of the ways to determine the value of a court reporter over and above their certifications will be to screen their references, especially the non-listed references. Each of the certified court-reporting agencies will screen the reporter’s references. However, the better agencies will request some references which are not listed on the reporter’s resume. In the way of analyzing various references, the agency can decide whether the reporter has handled some commendable assignments or whether their reputation is associated with quality.
Screening In Association To Technical Abilities
Similar to the majority of occupations, the court reporters have become increasingly defined in regards to technical practices, especially real-time reporting along with video reporting. When you require these specific abilities in your chosen reporter, you will not find it difficult to locate the reporters that have these skills.
Similar to how a few lawyers take on the cases that they do not specialize in, a few reporters take on the assignments that they are also not proficient in. To avoid such reporters, make sure you hire a reporter from reporting agencies that test the reporters on these skills opposed to making a judgment on these skills based on their certifications.
Court reporters that are screened in association to their personalities may seem a bit odd. This is because court reporters are typically sedentary and silent during assignments. However, the personality of the court reporter is more about how they can present themselves in depositions. It will also involve how they can react to the deponents in regards to deposition manuscripts.
Court reporters that are prejudiced easily bored or react in an angry way to specific topics may be prone to producing transcripts which are highly flawed or untrue in regards to the non-verbal reactions of the deponent. Also, some of the court-reporting agencies will rely on the reporter’s credentials. The reporting agencies that value their clients screen their reporters in association to their personalities.